COME BACK HERE after you take in and completely absorb the underlying concept of the webpage at the link below this paragraph. Observe particularly the top of the purple part in the middle of the page, and while there, you might want to click on the link to step number three in the middle purple area of the webpage -- but don't forget to hit the "back" button on your browser to get back here.
A link to a webpage that most people do not know about, but should...
Welcome back. Did you ask yourself at any point why government agencies (the sinister CDC and the corrupt NIH at that!) would provide a "Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System" when all you ever hear out of those exact same health agencies is that vaccines are perfectly safe. Didn't these same agencies harangue us all for months that the untested "fast track" H1N1 flu vaccine was safe, while this reporting mechanism "tool" of theirs was racking up an exorbitant amount of what they lamely refer to as "adverse events" resulting from that exact same vaccine? Yep, miscarriages, immune system dysfunction, chronic maladies, neurological disorders, diseases, and death are pretty damned "adverse" all right (that is just the short term "events", not the eventual long term events from accumulative synergistic effects). So, there sits their own reporting tool on their own website with the truth that vaccines are dangerous and even deadly, and they somehow manage to ignore it all and still lie that the vaccine is safe.
Recall that even pregnant women were encouraged and in fact dumped into the "high priority" category for injection. A huge number of those pregnant women that were coerced into being "high priority" victims of the toxic H1N1 sludge ended up reporting their subsequent "adverse event" miscarriages on this very same reporting mechanism "tool". Can you say "population control"? How about some deleted explicatives? Just search on the keywords "vaers h1n1 vaccine miscarriage" if you want evidence -- the about.com site that shows up in the search had an article on the subject, and they shut down the comments by women that miscarried when it approached 500; all had just been injected with the H1N1 vaccine within day or two prior. Didn't see anything about THAT on the corporate evening network news sponsored by the drug company commercials did you?
If you perused the above mentioned step number three in the purple area of the VAERS webpage, it provided a link to the "National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program"? That "program" has paid out two billion dollars in compensation for "vaccine injuries", much of it rewarded (in small amounts as bribes to keep them quiet) to families whose children were diagnosed with "brain injury" problems such as encephalitis a precursor to autism. But not autism? No, those special kangaroo courts have started ruling against families of children that suffered vaccine-induced autism, claiming that there was as yet is no irrefutable evidence that vaccines cause autism -- yet. You guessed it, these new rulings are a reversal of past rulings, which means that they once assented that vaccines caused autism.
We see it every day, you likely do also, a plethora of the media asserting over and over again that vaccines are safe. Never do they point to the facts. If they did, their sponsor would lose money, and therefore they would lose money. So, you see an interview of a victim in Time magazine which on the surface alludes to the possibility of the dangers of vaccines, but you barely get started, and there they go, saying vaccines are safe. Certifiably nauseating.
Remember, pass this along to others, have an effect, do something, turn the tide against the sinister charlatans before your family members or acquaintances become victims, paralyzed, diseased, dying an expensive death...
UPDATE. We attempt to maintain objectivity and consider all aspects of any issue. Consequently, we feel that it is imperative to provide the viewpoint of "the other (biased?) side" on the issue of the dangers of contracting H1N1 influenza during pregnancy. We do so by providing this link to an article on the topic, while maintaining our skeptical outlook on anything to do with medical treatment when consenting to hospitalization, which has been documented as dangerous... We feel compelled to remind you that the H1N1 vaccine is admitted by the vaccine manufacturers that the vaccine is "effective" [sic] less than 30% of the time, noting HOW much less they did not speculate -- our point being that you need to weigh the odds of being injected with a swill of toxic poisons that might be effective for one of four victims, but may well induce miscarriage and a host other "adverse events", against the long shot of catching a flu that was way over-hyped and simply avoiding hospitalization if anyone happens to "catch" the H1N1 flu. Lastly, we also must add the reminder that those hospitalized with H1N1 that died, died from "cytokine storms" which are induced by a hyperactive immune system which is precisely what results from the adjuvants in vaccines -- adjuvants intentionally "over-rev" the immune system. So, frankly we view the deaths as more likely caused by vaccines than any flu. The results of the "study" by mainstream medicine not only ignores the proven dangers of vaccines, but appears to be more fear mongering scare tactics. Can you say "eugenics"?
Thursday, March 18, 2010
CDC Inadvertantly Proves Vaccines are Dangerous
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

0 comments:
Post a Comment